I tested for PO4 using a RedSea Kit and am getting a reading of 1.0 Without the use of a reactor and very limited places to place any type of media, can someone suggest another option for reducing the PO4?
I have never been a fan of aluminum based products, they leach contaminants once exhausted unlike ferric oxide products which do not. On the flip side the alumimum products work faster but make sure you replace it often.
I prefer a slower change so the GFO products are my choice, in small amounts 24/7/365 and either in a reactor or a small bag in a medium flow area in smaller systems.
I have never been a fan of aluminum based products, they leach contaminants once exhausted unlike ferric oxide products which do not. On the flip side the alumimum products work faster but make sure you replace it often.
I prefer a slower change so the GFO products are my choice, in small amounts 24/7/365 and either in a reactor or a small bag in a medium flow area in smaller systems.
Seven months ago I would have agreed with this opinion. I now agree some aluminum based products will leach but have not seen this from sachems Phosguard product. Unlike GFO it also is able to reduce Po4 immediately but will maintain the drop for much longer then GFO. Unlike GFO the small balls do not brake down and become useless in a very short time. It also changes color to let you know when it needs to be changed and cost 1/3 the price,does not require a reactor unlike GFO that needs to be in a fluidized state to perform correctly,but performs excelant in a reactor also. I honestly have not found a negative aspect of this product. I have also had several friends with large systems try this product and they all have had the same positive result. When I ran GFO I would have to change it close to every two weeks. At 3 to 4 cups a month running GFO that gets expensive fast. A five gallon bucket of GFO will run over $700.00'five gallons of Phosguard is only $250.00 and it out performs it. Makes sense to me.
Don't believe Good GFO cost that much? Here's a link to what I use to order every year !
I am such a fan of this product that I actually gave it to the mentioned reefers for free to try it to see if they got the same results. All three have bought their last cans of GFO months ago!
I know Seachem did a paper on this but it was performed in house and not by a third party so is of limited value in my mind since they have a stake in the outcome.
Having worked in the municipal water treatment industry for going on 40 years now I know ferric oxide is the preferred media for arsenic removal and has been proven for decades. GFO and GFH once exhausted just don't adsorb anymore but they do not release and is why they are EPA and ANSI/NSF approved for human drinking water It is where we as aquarists have taken both of these medias from originally. There are also newer medias such as coated titanium dioxide that stands up better than GFO. I will continue to use a combination of GFO and a refugium with macroalgaes until something better comes along. Another perk of working in the industry is I have sources for less expensive GFO which helps out too.
Here are more studies and papers and none shows any release of substances once GFO is exhausted. A couple point out the advantage of a slower reaction than aluminum based medias and its effects on corals.
I guess it boils down to it being a personal choice as there are supporters of both medias as well as more recent articles on Lanthanum Chloride but I don't think I'm ready to go there yet.
On another note I've read that Kalkwasser was known for it's ability to lower PO4. Is this correct?
Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk
It's common to see a slight drop in Po4 once you have it dialed in and running awhile. It won't drop enough to solve the high readings you are getting. Sorry
Even if it does precipitate out it has not left the tank other than a small amount that gets skimmed out so the bulk of it is still there in one form or another.