I believe the report that found Tunze numbers are low also found that vortec numbers were high... so aren't both companies guilty of false advertising?
Personally I think a lawsuit is ridiculous. Yes, it is unfortunate that the flow numbers from one study suggest that the Tunze numbers are low. But there is no standard for how to test flow rates. Besides, why is a over estimating worse that under estimating?
Because Vortechs are good and Tunze....??....Not so much?
Disclaimer:
(Opinion based purely of the fact that I have Vortechs and not Tunzes although I have a 6015 and if they claim it moves any water at all they are exaggerating)
Originally Posted by Tom@HaslettMI
I believe the report that found Tunze numbers are low also found that vortec numbers were high... so aren't both companies guilty of false advertising?
Personally I think a lawsuit is ridiculous. Yes, it is unfortunate that the flow numbers from one study suggest that the Tunze numbers are low. But there is no standard for how to test flow rates. Besides, why is a over estimating worse that under estimating?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Tom@HaslettMI
